Do they even think?

Since the Hutt's last day on Friday, we've been without proper leadership. We presumed that Shoes, whose job description includes taking over when the director is unable to work, was automatically acting director. Apparently not.

At our staff meeting today we had a representative from our board of directors give us an update on the search for the Hutt's replacement. This included a "who's in charge" talk. The rep (who we'll call Apple Head) explained that normally Shoes would, as we presumed, automatically be named but that in a conversation Shoes expressed doubt in her ability to do the job (which is problematic given that she is being paid for it). So, there are currently three things being considered to cover us until a new director can be hired.
A) Shoes is named acting director and we are all expected to help her out.
B) A former assistant director who retired 4 years ago is brought back part time.
C) (and Apple Head doesn't even know if this is even legal) We bring back the Hutt part time.

The Hutt has only been gone four days, people! Four days! We just got rid of it and they want to bring it back?! Who of all the morons flying around thought that was a good idea?